Meat Importers Council of America Monday, September 06, 2010
  Membership   Log on   News   Importing   Food Safety   Handbook on the Web   Contacts/Links   World Trade   About    
About Membership

MICA 49th AGM & Conference

Who is MICA?

Why Become A MICA Member?

MICA Committees

MICA Membership Categories

MICA Dues and Assesments

MICA Membership Form

MICA History

MICA By-Laws

Fat Claims Adjustment

Fat Claims Guidelines 2007

Membership

MICA History
The Meat Importers' Council, Inc. ("MIC") was formed in 1962 as a non-profit national trade 
association of members engaging in the purchase, importation, handling and sale of imported 
meat, mainly fresh frozen beef, in the United States. 
The first meeting of an Executive Committee of the MIC was held on June 19, 1962 in New York 
City. Those present were: 

Sydney Washer, John Thallon & Co., Inc.
John Ward The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc.
Eli Jacobson Chicago Dressed Beef Company
Frank Arma Commodity Service Corporation
David Magaziner A. J. Mills & Co., Inc.
Arthur Hartog Thomas Borthwick & Sons (USA) Ltd.
Kenneth Roberson International Packers Ltd.
George Pattison Canada Packers, Inc
Si Silverman S & W Imports, Inc.

Mr. Ray Schlotterer was appointed Secretary and he was requested to set up By-laws and arrange 
to incorporate in the State of New York. Mr. Schlotterer was also requested to send out 
membership applications with a set initiation fee of $100. 

The principal goals as stated in the By-laws are: The Corporation is a voluntary organization 
which operates without pecuniary profit to itself or any member. The purposes of the 
Corporation, as stated in its certificate of incorporation, and only to the extent that said purposes 
are lawful, are as follows: 

  • To foster the trade, commerce and interests of importers and exporters of fresh and/or frozen 
    and/or cured and/or cooked and/or canned meats; to seek and obtain relief from unlawful or 
    burdensome exactions, statues and regulations; to work with importers' and exporters' 
    associations, domestic or foreign governmental bodies and others toward solutions to industry 
    problems; to procure uniformity and certainty in customs and usages of the meat trade; to 
    distribute accurate information to its members and to the public; to settle differences and 
    promote free intercourse between its members and those with whom they deal. 
  • Mr. George Pattison was elected as the first Treasurer in 1962. In the intervening years other 
    Treasurers were Messrs. Bernard Bowman (Bernard Bowman Corporation), Moritz Velleman 
    (Ovimpex, Inc.), Edward Henderson (A. J. Mills & Co., Inc.), George McNeely (Ballagh & 
    Thrall, Inc.), Richard Atkinson (A.S.C.-Meyners Company), and currently Stuart Leifer (Pierce 
    Trading Corporation). 

    The first Annual Meeting of MIC was held on September 23, 1962 at The Palmer House in 

    Chicago, Illinois during the American Meat Institute Annual Convention, a pattern that has been 
    followed ever since. The Secretary reported that MIC's membership comprised twenty-three 
    companies. While MICA's membership has grown over the years into the hundreds, very few of 
    the original twenty-three remain today.

    The 1962 Annual Meeting agenda discussion included: 

  • Shipping. 
  • Inspection of mutton and related questions. 
  • The standardization of markings. 
  • A future meeting between representatives of the Australian and New Zealand Meat Boards 
    and representatives of U.S. livestock interest.
  • Back in 1962 Americans were generally unaware that it was the importation of lean fresh frozen 
    boneless beef that greatly increased their ability to enjoy, at affordable prices, hamburgers, 
    franks, luncheon meats and many processed convenience foods. Americans on the go, those with 
    low incomes and retired on fixed incomes, traditionally find these processed meat items to be a 
    prime source of nutritious, low-cost, enjoyable food.

    The first meeting of the Board of Directors was held on April 14, 1964 in New York City. The 
    Secretary presented a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, which was filed 
    in the office of the Secretary of State of New York in March of 1964, and the Constitution and 
    By-laws of the Corporation, subscribed by all of the charter members of the Association, were 
    unanimously approved by the Directors.

    In 1969 the name of the Corporation was amended to the Meat Importers Council of America, 
    Inc. ("MICA"). 
    Since the Chairmanship of Sydney Washer from 1962 to 1966, the following have served as 
    Chairmen of the MICA:
  • Kenneth Roberson, International Packers Ltd., from 1966 to 1969 
  • John Ward, The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc., from 1969 to 1973 
  • William O'Reilly, John Thallon & Co., Inc., from 1973 to 1977 
  • Al Leifer, Pierce Trading Corporation, from 1977 to 1982 
  • Graeme Goodsir, Canada Packers, Inc., from 1982 to 1984 
  • George McNeely, Ballagh & Thrall, Inc., from 1984 to 1986 
  • Richard Atkinson, A.S.C. Meat Imports, Inc., from 1986 to 1988 
  • Al Leifer, Pierce Trading Corporation, second term from 1988 to 1990 
  • David Jackson, The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc., from 1990 to 1991 
  • Edgar Staren, Starmill, Inc., from 1991 to 1993 
  • Joel Berg, JBJ Trading Corporation, from 1993 to 1996 
  • Peter Maloney, Louis Dreyfus Corporation, from 1996 to 1998 
  • Richard Atkinson, A.S.C.-Meyners Company, second term from 1998 to present 
  • In the early 1960's, the Meat Importers Council engaged the law firm of Barnes, Richardson & 
    Colburn of New York City as their Legal Counsel. Messrs. Joseph Bradley Colburn, James H. 
    Lundquist and Rufus E. Jarman, Jr. have been in charge of the MICA account at Barnes, 
    Richardson & Colburn over the years.
    Additionally, Mr. Jarman served as Secretary for several years beginning in 1966, following 
    Arthur Hartog. Other MICA Secretaries have been Richard King, Kenneth Roberson, and 
    William Morrison. Mr. Morrison joined in 1979 to fill the newly created position of Executive 
    Director (which includes the Secretary's function) and has occupied that position to date.
    Over the years, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn has been instrumental in assisting MICA's efforts 
    in dealing with the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Customs Service, Office 
    of the U.S. Trade Representative, and U.S. International Trade Commission on meat imports, and 
    specifically on quota matters, and handling cases challenging laws restricting the free sale of 
    imported meats, canned or fresh frozen, and various meat products. 
    Since its inception, MICA has also coordinated with groups representing foreign suppliers, 
    initially mainly Australia, New Zealand and Ireland, and subsequently the Central American 
    supplying countries. In recent years, as South American countries have started to be approved (so 
    far Uruguay and Argentina), MICA has expanded its global coordinating efforts to include such 
    new suppliers. 
    Exporters (see Country Profiles) of wholesome frozen boneless meats to the U.S. are located in 
    Argentina, Australia, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Finland, 
    Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Uruguay, Sweden and the 
    European Union. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are the largest suppliers. 
    In 1968 the firm of John J. Madigan Associates was engaged as Economic Advisor to the 
    Council. In 1970, after Mr. Madigan's retirement, the firm was run by George L. Abraham and 
    then changed its name to Abraham & Associates, Inc. 
    Abraham & Associates, Inc. continued to provide economic service to the Council until the 
    retirement of George L. Abraham in 1992. Since then, Dr. Richard Andersen of Sparks 
    Companies Inc. in Memphis, Tennessee has been Economic Advisor to MICA. Dr. Andersen 
    regularly conducts Economic Workshop Sessions at MICA's meetings throughout the year and 
    makes reports at these meetings as well in periodic Newsletters.
    In 1973, MICA's Board and membership approved the Guidelines for the Settlement of Fat 
    Claims. These Guidelines, amended on several occasions, are recommended conditions of trade 
    between buyer and seller relating to imported meat sold on a guaranteed chemical lean basis, 
    where no other understanding exists. They have been well received in the trade. In recent years, 
    MICA and Australian suppliers have devoted much effort to a modified or alternative system, the 
    Code of Practice for the Settlement of Fat Claims on Meat Imported into the U.S.A. "COP" has 
    not, however, been adopted and its future is unclear as of this writing. 
    As of 1999 MICA's members total over 200 business organizations, and they account for the 
    great majority of U.S. imports of fresh frozen beef covered by tariff rate quota (TRQ) and other 
    meat products. In addition to importers, members of the MICA include exporters, users, 
    steamship companies, port authorities, warehousemen, truckers, laboratories, customs brokers and 
    others who derive a benefit from the import trade
    For its first eighteen years, MICA's office was located in New York City. In 1979 its office 
    moved to Arlington, Virginia, adjacent to the nation's capitol for easier access to branches of 
    government affecting MICA's members. MICA is staff by a full-time Executive Director who 
    reports to its Chairman and Board of Directors.
    In addition to an annual meeting held in the fall of each year during the American Meat Institute's 
    Annual Convention, MICA conducts meetings throughout the country during the year at Gulf 
    Coast and West Coast locations. The West Coast Meetings are held in conjunction with the 
    National Meat Association's Annual Convention.
    For years MICA's importer members operated under the Meat Import Act of 1979 and 1964 
    (Public Law 88-482) which provided for the imposition of meat controls on certain fresh, chilled 
    and frozen beef, veal, mutton and goat meat products. 
    Like its predecessor, the 1979 law mandated quantitative import controls if imports were 
    expected to exceed 110 percent of the formula quantity. The 1979 Act added a so-called 
    "countercyclical" approach to computing the allowable import level. The net effect of the 1964 
    and 1979 laws was to curtail the supply of imported lean beef in spite of an ever-increasing need 
    for this product. To this day, the United States does not produce lean, boneless manufacturing 
    type beef in sufficient quantity to satisfy demand. 
    In an effort to combat this legislation, MICA's Board has authorized various publications and 
    position papers over the years to seek freer trade in imported meat that had the specific purpose of 
    explaining to members of the U.S. Congress and others why the curtailing of meat imports would 
    be a blow to the public. In the 1960's and 1970's these included: 
    ? The Case Against Restriction on Meat Imports 
    ? The Facts: About Imported Lean Beef
    From its inception, MICA has always opposed all restrictions and quota limitations. It went on 
    record with the 93rd Congress to repeal the then present law applicable to imported meats, P.L. 
    88-482. At the Chicago Annual Meeting that year, Chairman John Ward reported that: "Through 
    the efforts of this Council we were able to obtain the suspension of the meat quotas for the year 
    1973 by a Presidential Proclamation, and as a result roughly 40% more meat will be imported this 
    year."
    For more than thirty years members of MICA were burdened with trade barriers and have had to 
    take an active role in private sector work with U.S. officials engaged in bilateral and multilateral 
    trade negotiations dealing with tariff and non-tariff restraints on imported meats. 
    Through the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations in the 1990's, MICA promulgated its 
    opposition to continued quota and tariffs on imported meat products for the following reasons: 
    ??????? Elimination of the quota scheme would benefit U.S. meat processors and cattlemen, 
    while duty free treatment will help consumers. 
    ? Continuation of meat import restrictions would conflict with U.S. beef industry trade 
    policies and U.S. multilateral trade negotiating commitments. 
    ? Elimination of the quota scheme would benefit U.S. consumers, who bear most of the 
    costs of the current system of trade distorting protection. Because meat and meat-food 
    product markets in America are very diverse and complex, with large numbers of importers, 
    purveyors and purchasers competing for available supplies twelve months of the year, savings 
    based on duty-free and quota free imports would be passed on to U.S. consumers. 
    With the advent of 1995, the imported meat industry saw fundamental changes in that Public Law 
    88-482 and the Meat Import Act of 1979 were officially repealed, replaced by a tariff rate quota 
    allowing an annual base amount of 697,000 metric tons of "in-quota" beef. 
    The U.S. tariff rate quota allows Australia to enter 378,214 MT, New Zealand 213,402 MT, All 
    Other 64,805 MT. Uruguay and Argentina are guaranteed 20,000 metric tons each, and Japan 
    200 MT. Under NAFTA both Canada and Mexico are exempt from the tariff rate quota. A new 
    ad valorem duty to apply above the base amount started at the 31% level and is now reduced 
    27.3%.
    Imports of frozen boneless beef account for around 7 percent of total U.S. consumption of beef 
    products and, accordingly, pose no competitive threat to U.S. cattlemen, farmers, or meat 
    processors.
    While the Uruguay Round changes made significant progress towards freer trade, a great deal still 
    remains to be done. Since implementation, world-wide demand has not been strong and 
    significant TRQ allocation has gone unused. A high MICA priority has been to establish a 
    procedure for "temporary" TRQ reallocation, where appropriate under market conditions at any 
    given time.
    Other significant priorities in recent years have included:
    ?? To seek better communication with the domestic producing industry, both directly and 
    through the Cattlemen's Beef Board in implementation of the "check-off" program.

    ? Cooperating with Government and foreign supplier representatives to handle food safety 
    concerns, which are of increasing importance to all segments of the meat and food industries.

    ? Seeking to counter old and new forms of domestic protectionism which continues to spring 
    up notwithstanding considerable advances in the level of knowledge about imported meat and 
    its important positive roll in the U.S. economy. In recent years, for example, there have been 
    repeated efforts by certain domestic groups to pass new country of origin laws at the Federal 
    level - laws which would be harmful for all concerned.

    For many reasons, including the fact that these imports come largely from Australia, New 
    Zealand, Latin America and other areas where seasons are the reverse of those in North America, 
    imported manufacturing meat complements domestic production, serving each year to level-out 
    seasonal variations in the supplies available for U.S. production. Thus, imported meats not only 
    fill out an insufficient overall U.S. supply, but also tend to stabilize supply conditions and reduce 
    the need for costly freezer storage of domestic production.

    It is MICA's belief that imported frozen boneless meat, predominately beef, forms an essential 
    part of the historic total U.S. supply of meat. MICA continues to seek the end of all restrictions 
    in order to benefit U.S. consumers, the economy and, of course, its friends and members.