![]() |
Meat Importers Council of America | Monday, September 06, 2010 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
About Membership
|
Membership
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MICA History
Mr. Ray Schlotterer was appointed Secretary and he was requested to set up By-laws and arrange
The principal goals as stated in the By-laws are: The Corporation is a voluntary organization Mr. George Pattison was elected as the first Treasurer in 1962. In the intervening years other Treasurers were Messrs. Bernard Bowman (Bernard Bowman Corporation), Moritz Velleman (Ovimpex, Inc.), Edward Henderson (A. J. Mills & Co., Inc.), George McNeely (Ballagh & Thrall, Inc.), Richard Atkinson (A.S.C.-Meyners Company), and currently Stuart Leifer (Pierce Trading Corporation). The first Annual Meeting of MIC was held on September 23, 1962 at The Palmer House in Chicago, Illinois during the American Meat Institute Annual Convention, a pattern that has been followed ever since. The Secretary reported that MIC's membership comprised twenty-three companies. While MICA's membership has grown over the years into the hundreds, very few of the original twenty-three remain today. The 1962 Annual Meeting agenda discussion included: and representatives of U.S. livestock interest. boneless beef that greatly increased their ability to enjoy, at affordable prices, hamburgers, franks, luncheon meats and many processed convenience foods. Americans on the go, those with low incomes and retired on fixed incomes, traditionally find these processed meat items to be a prime source of nutritious, low-cost, enjoyable food. The first meeting of the Board of Directors was held on April 14, 1964 in New York City. The Secretary presented a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, which was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of New York in March of 1964, and the Constitution and By-laws of the Corporation, subscribed by all of the charter members of the Association, were unanimously approved by the Directors. In 1969 the name of the Corporation was amended to the Meat Importers Council of America, Inc. ("MICA"). Since the Chairmanship of Sydney Washer from 1962 to 1966, the following have served as Chairmen of the MICA: Colburn of New York City as their Legal Counsel. Messrs. Joseph Bradley Colburn, James H. Lundquist and Rufus E. Jarman, Jr. have been in charge of the MICA account at Barnes, Richardson & Colburn over the years. Additionally, Mr. Jarman served as Secretary for several years beginning in 1966, following Arthur Hartog. Other MICA Secretaries have been Richard King, Kenneth Roberson, and William Morrison. Mr. Morrison joined in 1979 to fill the newly created position of Executive Director (which includes the Secretary's function) and has occupied that position to date. Over the years, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn has been instrumental in assisting MICA's efforts in dealing with the U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Customs Service, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and U.S. International Trade Commission on meat imports, and specifically on quota matters, and handling cases challenging laws restricting the free sale of imported meats, canned or fresh frozen, and various meat products. Since its inception, MICA has also coordinated with groups representing foreign suppliers, initially mainly Australia, New Zealand and Ireland, and subsequently the Central American supplying countries. In recent years, as South American countries have started to be approved (so far Uruguay and Argentina), MICA has expanded its global coordinating efforts to include such new suppliers. Exporters (see Country Profiles) of wholesome frozen boneless meats to the U.S. are located in Argentina, Australia, Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Finland, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Uruguay, Sweden and the European Union. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are the largest suppliers. In 1968 the firm of John J. Madigan Associates was engaged as Economic Advisor to the Council. In 1970, after Mr. Madigan's retirement, the firm was run by George L. Abraham and then changed its name to Abraham & Associates, Inc. Abraham & Associates, Inc. continued to provide economic service to the Council until the retirement of George L. Abraham in 1992. Since then, Dr. Richard Andersen of Sparks Companies Inc. in Memphis, Tennessee has been Economic Advisor to MICA. Dr. Andersen regularly conducts Economic Workshop Sessions at MICA's meetings throughout the year and makes reports at these meetings as well in periodic Newsletters. In 1973, MICA's Board and membership approved the Guidelines for the Settlement of Fat Claims. These Guidelines, amended on several occasions, are recommended conditions of trade between buyer and seller relating to imported meat sold on a guaranteed chemical lean basis, where no other understanding exists. They have been well received in the trade. In recent years, MICA and Australian suppliers have devoted much effort to a modified or alternative system, the Code of Practice for the Settlement of Fat Claims on Meat Imported into the U.S.A. "COP" has not, however, been adopted and its future is unclear as of this writing. As of 1999 MICA's members total over 200 business organizations, and they account for the great majority of U.S. imports of fresh frozen beef covered by tariff rate quota (TRQ) and other meat products. In addition to importers, members of the MICA include exporters, users, steamship companies, port authorities, warehousemen, truckers, laboratories, customs brokers and others who derive a benefit from the import trade For its first eighteen years, MICA's office was located in New York City. In 1979 its office moved to Arlington, Virginia, adjacent to the nation's capitol for easier access to branches of government affecting MICA's members. MICA is staff by a full-time Executive Director who reports to its Chairman and Board of Directors. In addition to an annual meeting held in the fall of each year during the American Meat Institute's Annual Convention, MICA conducts meetings throughout the country during the year at Gulf Coast and West Coast locations. The West Coast Meetings are held in conjunction with the National Meat Association's Annual Convention. For years MICA's importer members operated under the Meat Import Act of 1979 and 1964 (Public Law 88-482) which provided for the imposition of meat controls on certain fresh, chilled and frozen beef, veal, mutton and goat meat products. Like its predecessor, the 1979 law mandated quantitative import controls if imports were expected to exceed 110 percent of the formula quantity. The 1979 Act added a so-called "countercyclical" approach to computing the allowable import level. The net effect of the 1964 and 1979 laws was to curtail the supply of imported lean beef in spite of an ever-increasing need for this product. To this day, the United States does not produce lean, boneless manufacturing type beef in sufficient quantity to satisfy demand. In an effort to combat this legislation, MICA's Board has authorized various publications and position papers over the years to seek freer trade in imported meat that had the specific purpose of explaining to members of the U.S. Congress and others why the curtailing of meat imports would be a blow to the public. In the 1960's and 1970's these included: ? The Case Against Restriction on Meat Imports ? The Facts: About Imported Lean Beef From its inception, MICA has always opposed all restrictions and quota limitations. It went on record with the 93rd Congress to repeal the then present law applicable to imported meats, P.L. 88-482. At the Chicago Annual Meeting that year, Chairman John Ward reported that: "Through the efforts of this Council we were able to obtain the suspension of the meat quotas for the year 1973 by a Presidential Proclamation, and as a result roughly 40% more meat will be imported this year." For more than thirty years members of MICA were burdened with trade barriers and have had to take an active role in private sector work with U.S. officials engaged in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations dealing with tariff and non-tariff restraints on imported meats. Through the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations in the 1990's, MICA promulgated its opposition to continued quota and tariffs on imported meat products for the following reasons: ??????? Elimination of the quota scheme would benefit U.S. meat processors and cattlemen, while duty free treatment will help consumers. ? Continuation of meat import restrictions would conflict with U.S. beef industry trade policies and U.S. multilateral trade negotiating commitments. ? Elimination of the quota scheme would benefit U.S. consumers, who bear most of the costs of the current system of trade distorting protection. Because meat and meat-food product markets in America are very diverse and complex, with large numbers of importers, purveyors and purchasers competing for available supplies twelve months of the year, savings based on duty-free and quota free imports would be passed on to U.S. consumers. With the advent of 1995, the imported meat industry saw fundamental changes in that Public Law 88-482 and the Meat Import Act of 1979 were officially repealed, replaced by a tariff rate quota allowing an annual base amount of 697,000 metric tons of "in-quota" beef. The U.S. tariff rate quota allows Australia to enter 378,214 MT, New Zealand 213,402 MT, All Other 64,805 MT. Uruguay and Argentina are guaranteed 20,000 metric tons each, and Japan 200 MT. Under NAFTA both Canada and Mexico are exempt from the tariff rate quota. A new ad valorem duty to apply above the base amount started at the 31% level and is now reduced 27.3%. Imports of frozen boneless beef account for around 7 percent of total U.S. consumption of beef products and, accordingly, pose no competitive threat to U.S. cattlemen, farmers, or meat processors. While the Uruguay Round changes made significant progress towards freer trade, a great deal still remains to be done. Since implementation, world-wide demand has not been strong and significant TRQ allocation has gone unused. A high MICA priority has been to establish a procedure for "temporary" TRQ reallocation, where appropriate under market conditions at any given time. Other significant priorities in recent years have included: ?? To seek better communication with the domestic producing industry, both directly and through the Cattlemen's Beef Board in implementation of the "check-off" program. ? Cooperating with Government and foreign supplier representatives to handle food safety concerns, which are of increasing importance to all segments of the meat and food industries. ? Seeking to counter old and new forms of domestic protectionism which continues to spring up notwithstanding considerable advances in the level of knowledge about imported meat and its important positive roll in the U.S. economy. In recent years, for example, there have been repeated efforts by certain domestic groups to pass new country of origin laws at the Federal level - laws which would be harmful for all concerned. For many reasons, including the fact that these imports come largely from Australia, New Zealand, Latin America and other areas where seasons are the reverse of those in North America, imported manufacturing meat complements domestic production, serving each year to level-out seasonal variations in the supplies available for U.S. production. Thus, imported meats not only fill out an insufficient overall U.S. supply, but also tend to stabilize supply conditions and reduce the need for costly freezer storage of domestic production. It is MICA's belief that imported frozen boneless meat, predominately beef, forms an essential part of the historic total U.S. supply of meat. MICA continues to seek the end of all restrictions in order to benefit U.S. consumers, the economy and, of course, its friends and members.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||